The Digital Fotographer
August 29, 2008, 05:36:20 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Check-out our BOOKSTORE for some great photography books at great prices!
 
  Home   Forum   Help Gallery Bookstore Calendar Members Login Register   *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 29, 2008, 05:36:20 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search
Sponsors
Please support this site by buying your photo gear from one of our sponsors: 

NAPP




Members
Total Members: 267
Latest: alecw
Stats
Total Posts: 20758
Total Topics: 2287
Online Today: 11
Online Ever: 92
(September 21, 2007, 06:50:51 AM)
Users Online
Users: 2
Guests: 4
Total: 6
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Need macro crash course.  (Read 133 times)
epatt250
Adults
Contributor Extraordinaire
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 722


View Gallery



View Profile
« on: July 04, 2008, 07:38:50 AM »

 Ok everyone seems to manual focus on macro stuff. Is AF not accurate enough or something? Manual focusing is gonna be next to impossible on the 40D w/o a split screen focus screen. I had one on my 20D but sold it b/c it wont work on the 40D.

 I have read alot about using live view to focus. I have never even had my camera in live view. How are all you macro pros doing it? Does everyone have a split screen for MF?
Logged
sduford
D700 on the way!
Administrator
I'm from Krypton
*****
Offline Offline

Camera1: Nikon D700
Camera2: Canon SD870 IS
Posts: 2376


View Gallery


Full Frame Baby!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2008, 07:44:28 AM »

Yes manual focus is pretty much a necessity because DOF is so narrow. I do have a split focussing screen on my D200, but no live view. But even before I got my Katz Eye split focussing screen, I could focus quite well manually as the small DOF enabled me to easily see where the focus point was on my subject.
« Last Edit: July 04, 2008, 07:46:46 AM by sduford » Logged

Sylvain Duford
There is no substitute for aperture, but image stabilisation is darn nice!
My Blog, My Gallery
darkvibe
Global Moderator
I'm from Krypton
*****
Offline Offline

Camera1: Canon 30D
Camera2: Kodak V550 P&S
Posts: 1843


View Gallery



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2008, 08:12:34 AM »

I actually set the lens focus ring so it focuses at the max working distance and then move the camera in and out to do the actual focusing.  I don't have a split screen, i focus fine with the regular one.

I use extension tubes so i don't know if the depth of field is the same on your lens.  I imagine it is.
Logged

tirediron
Upper Classmen
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 140


View Gallery


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2008, 10:55:20 PM »

I need to invest in one of those katz-eye screens.  As far as focusing goes however, I use a focusing rail, setting the lens to the distance I want, and then moving the whole camera by means of the focusing rail to achieve the zone of focus I want.  Unless it's a very skittish insect or something like that, I find a bright penlight makes a great focusing aid.
Logged
Mt-biker
Member
**
Offline Offline

Camera1: Nikon D80
Camera2: Olympus C-760
Posts: 35


View Gallery



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2008, 12:49:48 PM »

Hey Darkvibe, ^^

Do those extension tubes work well? Do you use them with a long or short focal length lens for your macro shots?

Also do you use them on a lens with a macro feature built in already?

Thanks!
Logged
sduford
D700 on the way!
Administrator
I'm from Krypton
*****
Offline Offline

Camera1: Nikon D700
Camera2: Canon SD870 IS
Posts: 2376


View Gallery


Full Frame Baby!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2008, 03:45:05 PM »

The shorter the focal length, the more effective extension tubes are.
Logged

Sylvain Duford
There is no substitute for aperture, but image stabilisation is darn nice!
My Blog, My Gallery
darkvibe
Global Moderator
I'm from Krypton
*****
Offline Offline

Camera1: Canon 30D
Camera2: Kodak V550 P&S
Posts: 1843


View Gallery



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: July 14, 2008, 04:09:21 PM »

Yep.  I use them on my 50mm f1.8.  Never tried them on a longer lens since that combo gives me great results.  I've never used them on a lens that is already macro.

http://www.darkvibe.org/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=1
all of those are w/ the 50mm 1.8 and various lengths of extension tubes.  All were taken with the camera on manual, f16-ish (exif data is in them, click the "i" icon in my gallery to view it) with the flash on ttl with FEC set to -1 stop or so.  Flash is mounted on a delta flash bracket and the flash had a stofen tupperware diffuser on it for all of them.
Logged

sduford
D700 on the way!
Administrator
I'm from Krypton
*****
Offline Offline

Camera1: Nikon D700
Camera2: Canon SD870 IS
Posts: 2376


View Gallery


Full Frame Baby!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: July 14, 2008, 04:34:26 PM »

Just as a follow up to my earlier post, in theory, 50mm of extension on a 50mm lens gives you 1:1 magnification. On a 100mm lens, it would give you only 2:1 magnification.
Logged

Sylvain Duford
There is no substitute for aperture, but image stabilisation is darn nice!
My Blog, My Gallery
Mt-biker
Member
**
Offline Offline

Camera1: Nikon D80
Camera2: Olympus C-760
Posts: 35


View Gallery



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: August 23, 2008, 07:29:59 PM »

Awesome thanks for the info!! (I forgot I had posted this a month ago.) I just happen to have a Nikon 50mm 1.8 in my bag. I'll have to look into these tubes.

DarkVibe- That shot of the fly with red eyes is ridiculous.  cheers  I love it!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
TinyPortal v0.9.8 © Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!